I will take the information under advisement. But I still hold with Webster Dictionary statement about "Mulatto". You might have areas of the Colonies/US which had groups of people: Native American, freed slaves and white (like in FL)that mixed together in a small community, but they were referred to as Seminole. I am afraid my "fellow Whites" rather have the term "Mulatto" expanded to include "Native American" because they rather not find their blood lines includes African-American. Now D.N.A. testing will give you the the answer to that question and we do not have to go on others "personal opinion" what people "look like".
I believe years ago there was a site which showed the descendants of John Bolling of VA compared to others samples. Obviously totally different families. If you look at the picture of John Bolling Sr. of VA he doesn't look particurly "Indian" to me. On the other hand, the two pictures of my distant Bolen cousins, appear to show non-white features. Logically, they would be at least 12 generations from the time period of Pocahontas.
H.J. Bolen wants "us" to believe that these men just now "look like Pocahontas". Afraid I am not buying it. Another rule of Science, the child can not be dark than the darkest parent. Also I have two other pictures of Bolen men: gr-gr-grandfather Sion Monroe Bolen and his Uncle P.H. Bolen either have the same features as the other Bolen.
So a persons with the surname: Bolling, Bowling, Bolin, Bolen etc..... just take a test and it will rule you in or out as being member of the "Famous Bolling". I am afraid people rather hold on to their fairly tales rather than to have the truth. People have been holding on to their believes for decades and they do not want to have science comming along and take them away from them. Please, do not raise the point of "the cost of the test", they money spend doing a D.N.A. is far less than the cost of doing research.
As far as your family problem: D.N.A. will rule the various Y marker as African-American or not on the male line only. Now if you have distant cousins who are also interested in genealogy, you can look at your pedigree chart and trace the various lines back by the various Hapologroups.
I wish Family D.N.A. Web Site had a menus of all the various surnames that have been tested so we all could "share" the results. For people who have done their library work, armed with additional D.N.A. test, could/should be very helpful. Non-matches just as important as matches.
Since D.N.A. test were not used in our research by earlier researchers, people could make serious research errors.
The most serious error is when we have not found positive records giving us our ancestors' parents , and "we" try linking our ancestors with families that have been established.
If there is a "famous" person to try to link up with so much the better.
This is what as happened with Bolling, Boland, Bolen etc....research.
You can look at any well documented book on the descendants of Pocahontas and look at the generation of:
John Bolling (1700-1757) m. Elizabeth Blair and they had ONLY seven children: Thomas, John, Robert, Mary, Sarah, Archibald & Anne.
However, Bolen researchers wanting to link up with the above couple, self-published books, computer banks, articles, letters, telephone calls and now web sites have given to said Elizabeth Blair 20 CHILDREN: Metoaka, Archibald, Elizabeth, Wm., Jared, Martha, Benj., Dorthey, Thomas, John, Robert, Jane, Rodney, Mary, Rolfe, Edward, Sarah, Anne, Powhatan & James. All found in the notes of H.J. Bolen in his book "A Family History 1476-1976"
Also found on page 116 of the book published by Todd Bolen & Lois (Bolen) Stange in 1997 "The Bolling, Bowling, Bolen Family in America before 1800".
All can be found in the L.D.S. film collection and I am sure people are still passing around this information on their personal web site. People have totally no SHAME.
The above John Bolling who married Martha Jefferson, some very wild stories were made up about him and found in Todd Bolen's book. H.J. Bolen has their son John Bolling married to Alice Kennon, living VA then leaving for Granville Co. NC married to Martha Mangum (he has the wrong parents named for her). The main problem with his story is that John Bolling NEVER lived in NC. Remember John Bolling of VA signed his name as Bolling and the John Bowling who married Martha Mangum, made his "X" on records in Granville Co. VA. I guess the Bolen researchers want us to believe John Bolling of VA "got stupid" in NC and forgot how to sign his name!!
I wish in the past the true descendants of John Bolling of Sr., in public had confronted this false information and the people who continue to circulate it as FACT.
Now we have D.N.A. which can be used as a gate to stop people linking up with the wrong family group. If you think you are descendant of one of the additional children of Elizabeth Blair Bolling , proof it, take a D.N.A test and then in public post the results. For in the past if you posted incorrect information now you can post the correct Scientific Results.